Levy money is spent at the discretion of the school board. I can't vote for the renewal of the levy. In fact, I won't go at all since they need 2,300 plus voters to validate the election.

I could get long-winded in order to deflect criticism in response to my letter, but I will spare you. I'm sure some will misunderstand me. I support schools; not the $10,000 raise for our superintendent, Mr. Lockyer. Others I've talked to agree that this is not a good discretionary decision to make in a district so desperate for funding. At the same time, other district jobs were cut. He now makes between $90,000 and $100,000 a year. They like to compare our levy rate to others in the state. Let's compare this one particular salary to other superintendents. The Longview superintendent has 10,000 more students, and makes $10,000 dollars less! Our district has approximately 1,700 students. I know $10,000 dollars wouldn't cover everything that's needed, but jeez!

We could use that money for new books for the new libraries or a $10,000 air conditioning unit for a computer lab. If Mr. Lockyer was so worth it, then fine. But I would like to see the school board make a new discretionary decision - to lower the salary for the next superintendent we hire. Don't let this set a precedent.

Kaapi Lee Porter Corsi


Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.